High Court of Gujarat disposed of an oral contempt application after confirming the impugned orders have been implemented by the respondent authorities and notice is discharged. No further proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act are warranted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/425/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 425 of 2019
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19082 of 2016
==========================================================
RAFIK RAJAK MANSURI
Versus
JAGDISH PRASAD GUPTA
==========================================================
Appearance:
for the Applicant(s) No. 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,3,30,31,32,3 3,34,35,4,5,6,7,8,9 MS ASHLESHA M PATEL(6127) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Opponent(s) No. 3,5,6 NOTICE SERVED(4) for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,4
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 20/06/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE)
Heard Mr. H.S.Munshaw, learned advocate for respondent Nos.3,5 and 6.
Our attention is drawn to communication dated 18.6.2019 addressed by Deputy Secretary, Narmada Water Resources, Water Supply and Kalpsar Department to the Chief Administrative Officer, Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board whereby sanction is accorded by Finance Department on 14.6.2019 and consequential action is taken to implement the order dated 19.9.2018 passed by this Court and for which also, communication dated 19.6.2019 is addressed by the Chief Administrative Officer to Chief
Page 1 of 2
C/MCA/425/2019 ORDER
Engineer, Zone-5, Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Junagadh. Considering the above, at this stage, we are not inclined to proceed further under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. Notice is discharged.
It is expected of the authority to release the outstanding dues as early as possible.
(ANANT S. DAVE, ACJ)
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
RADHAKRISHNAN K.V.
Page 2 of 2
Rafik Rajak Mansuri
Anant S. Dave
Biren Vaishnav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
