The High Court disposed of a contempt application by observing that the impugned judgment involved substantial compliance, rendering the proceedings unsustainable.
Application disposed of; respondent directed to complete fixation of pay and other grievances within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/198/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 198 of 2019
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8123 of 2015
==========================================================
DEEPAK JAYANTILAL VAISHNAV
Versus SURENDRAKUMAR JAIN
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NIKHIL S KARIEL(2315) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 3 MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the Opponent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 24/06/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE)
In view of substantial compliance of the impugned oral judgment, proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act will not survive and the application stands disposed of, accordingly. However, it is expected of the respondent to complete the exercise with regard to fixation of pay and other grievances within a period of four weeks.
(ANANT S. DAVE, ACJ)
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
Bimal
Page 1 of 1
Deepak Jayantilal Vaishnav
Surendrakumar Jain
Anant S. Dave
Biren Vaishnav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
