The High Court at Ahmedabad disposed of R/CR.MA No. 6395 of 2019 as not pressed. The learned advocate for the applicant did not press the application, resulting in the rule being discharged while reserving liberty to file a fresh application later.
Rule discharged and liberty reserved to file fresh application after some time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/6395/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 6395 of 2019
==========================================================
JITUBHAI VELABHA GADHVI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance:
MR JV JAPEE(358) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR LB DABHI, APP(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 11/07/2019
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate for the applicant does
not press this application at this stage. Hence,
the present application stands disposed of as not
pressed. Rule is discharged. Liberty is reserved
to file fresh application after some time.
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
SRILATHA
Page 1 of 1
JITUBHAI VELABHA GADHVI
STATE OF GUJARAT
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court