In this oral order, the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad disposed of Criminal Misc. Application No. 3742 of 2019 by holding that the application was put up as not pressed by the applicant's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/3742/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 3742 of 2019
==========================================================
SIPAI RAHIM @ RAHLI RUSTAMBHAI NATHUBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AFTABHUSEN ANSARI(5320) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR BHAVESH B SARODE(6454) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MS NAMRATA R MULCHANDANI(9956) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR LB DABHI APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 05/07/2019
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate for the applicant does not press the present application. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharged.
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
MISHRA AMIT V.
Page 1 of 1
SIPAI RAHIM @ RAHLI RUSTAMBHAI NATHUBHAI
STATE OF GUJARAT
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
