Oral order noting that the applicant did not press the criminal miscellaneous application, resulting in its disposal as not pressed with the rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/2109/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 2109 of 2019
=======================================================
PATHAN SAHIRKHAN MUSTUFAKHAN
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
=======================================================
Appearance:
MR BHAVESH B SARODE(6454) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR KP RAVAL APP(2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
=======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 21/02/2019
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate for the applicant does not press
this application. Hence, the present application stands
disposed of as not pressed. Rule is discharged.
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.)
Gautam
Page 1 of 1
PATHAN SAHIRKHAN MUSTUFAKHAN
STATE OF GUJARAT
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court