In an oral order, a bench allowed an application seeking condonation of delay for filing a Letters Patent Appeal, relying on sworn averments judged as genuine.
Civil Application allowed; delay condoned; main appeal to be disposed of with innocuous direction to decide representation of 29.4.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CA/3645/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3645 of 2019
In
F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 23338 of 2019
========================================================== BHARATKUMAR FOJALAL MALI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT THRO THE SECRETARY
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR TL SHETH for MR POPATJI H SOLANKI(5213) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
Date : 11/11/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI)
Page 1 of 2
C/CA/3645/2019 ORDER
technicality when the main Letters Patent Appeal is requested to be disposed by passing innocuous order, we deem it proper to grant the Civil Application in terms of para 10(B). Accordingly, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of para 10(B).
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
(A.J. SHASTRI, J)
OMKAR
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of a delay of 2546 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal entailed sufficient cause.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BHARATKUMAR FOJALAL MALI
STATE OF GUJARAT
VIKRAM NATH
A.J. SHASTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
