This order condones the delay in filing an appeal and makes the corresponding application allowed under an oral order of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad.
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal; Rule made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CA/2018/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2018 of 2019
In
F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 18892 of 2019
======================================
RAMESHCHANDRA PRABHUDAS NIMAVAT
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
====================================== Appearance:
ARCHANABEN B GOSWAMI(8154) for the Applicant MR MAHENDRA U VORA(3034) for the Applicant RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 MR. D. M. DEVANANI, AGP for the Respondents
======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT and
HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 03/09/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT)
Looking to the averments made in this application, the delay occurred in filing the appeal is required to be condoned. Hence, the delay condonation application is allowed. Delay occurred in filing the appeal is condoned. Rule made absolute .
(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.)
(A. P. THAKER, J.)
AMAR RATHOD...
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the appeal requires condonation.
RAMESHCHANDRA PRABHUDAS NIMAVAT
STATE OF GUJARAT
S.R.BRAHMBHATT
A. P. THAKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
