The High Court condoned a 63-day delay in filing a letters patent appeal against a Single Judge's order under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, finding the cause sufficiently explained.
Condonation of 63 days delay and rule made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CA/151/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 151 of 2019
In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2719 of 2019
================================================================ STATE OF GUJARAT
Versus
JAGAT B. PATEL
================================================================ Appearance:
MR SOAHAM JOSHI, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3 MS DISHA N NANAVATY(2957) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 08/05/2019
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
Page 1 of 2
C/CA/151/2019 ORDER
learned advocates for the respective parties and more particularly, considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay caused in filing the letters patent appeal has been sufficiently explained.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
B.U. PARMAR
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 63 days in filing the letters patent appeal warrants condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Gujarat
Jagat B. Patel
Harsha Devani
Bhargav D. Karia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
