Jabrusinh Varvaji Vaghela v. State of Gujarat
Case brief
What is this about?
A PIL was filed seeking a writ of mandamus and interim injunction restraining enforcement of a public notice by Respondent No. 2 and 3. The Chief Justice held that the petitioner was merely an interested party seeking personal relief, not an aggrieved class, and dismissed the petition as not maintainable as a PIL.
What did the court decide?
The petition was dismissed in light of being an inappropriate PIL; liberty granted for other remedies.