Petitioner sought withdrawal of special civil application regarding potential detention. Court allowed withdrawal without detention proposal existing. Notice discharged.
Withdrawal of petition permitted; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8342/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8342 of 2018
==========================================================
SANJEEVSINGH ALIAS TINKU JAYVIRSINGH CHAUHAN
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance:
MR K R MISHRA(6312) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR KRUTIK PARIKH, AGP (1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 05/06/2018
ORAL ORDER
Learned AGP Mr. Krutik Parikh places on record communication dated 04.06.2018 and states that there is no proposal to detain the petitioner.
In view of the above statement, learned advocate Mr. K.R. Mishra for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Therefore, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn. Notice is discharged.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
TAUSIF SAIYED
Page 1 of 1
SANJEEVSINGH ALIAS TINKU JAYVIRSINGH CHAUHAN
STATE OF GUJARAT
BIREN VAISHNAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
