The petitioner sought withdrawal of a petition challenging detention. The respondent authority confirmed no detention order existed. The court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
Permission to withdraw granted. Petition disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/7796/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7796 of 2018
==========================================================
JAUL ALIAS JAVLO MAYA S/O HAMIDKHAN MALEK
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
VALIMOHAMMED PATHAN(6383) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R)(71) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3 MR DEEPAK ALORIA, AGP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
Date : 29/10/2018
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing,
Mr.Deepak Aloria, learned Assistant Government
Pleader, on instructions from the officer of the
respondent authority, has categorically made a
statement that till date no order of detention is
passed against the petitioner.
Relying upon this statement, learned advocate
for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
present petition. Permission, as prayed for, is
granted. Present petition stands disposed of as
withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted
earlier stands vacated.
(A.J. SHASTRI, J)
V.J. SATWARA
Page 1 of 1
Jaul Alias Javlo Maya S/o Hamid Khan Malek
State of Gujarat
A.J. Shastri
V.J. Satwara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court