The High Court considered a petition filed after a notification recalled the transfer of Customs Appeals from Ahmedabad to Mumbai benches. Declaring the petition infructuous, the Court disposed of the matter without further orders.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/6977/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6977 of 2018
=============================================================
AHMEDABAD CESTAT BAR ASSOCIATION
Versus
UNION OF INDIA
=============================================================
Appearance:
MR HITESH V PATEL(6090) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,2,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 MS TRUSHA K PATEL(2434) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3
=============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA 3rd July 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned counsel for the petitioner places on record, a Notification dated 19th June 2018 by virtue of which earlier decision to transfer the Customs Appeals from CESTAT, Ahmedabad to CESTAT, Mumbai is recalled. He submitted that in view of these developments, the petition has become infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
[Akil Kureshi, J.] [B.N Karia, J.]
Prakash
Page 1 of 1
Ahmedabad CESTAT Bar Association
Union of India
A. K. Kureshi
B. N. Karia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
