The High Court of Gujarat disposed of three special civil applications as withdrawn following the petitioner's submission that the issue was already resolved by the tribunal. Interim relief was vacated.
Petitions disposed as withdrawn; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/4134/2013 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4134 of 2013 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4135 of 2013 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4136 of 2013
========================================================== TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD - MUMBAI
Versus
DODIYA MANOHARBHAI PRATAPSINH
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR HARDIK H DAVE(6295) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 4 MR MAULIK J SHELAT(2500) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 3 MR VA MANSURI(2880) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. SHAH
Date : 25/06/2018
COMMON ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati submits that since the issue and anxiety of the Insurance Company has been taken care by the tribunal, petitioner does not want to proceed further in these petitions. Therefore, petitions stand disposed as withdrawn. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated.
(S.G. SHAH, J)
DRASHTI K. SHUKLA
Page 1 of 1
Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd - Mumbai
Dodiya Manoharbhai Pratapsinh
S.G. Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
