Special civil application withdrawn by petitioner because no order passed against them yet. Disposed as withdrawn; ad-interim relief vacated.
Rule discharged; Ad-interim relief vacated; Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/3210/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3210 of 2018
With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5353 of 2018
==========================================================
SALIM @ TOTO SHAKILBHAI ANSARI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RM VALIULLA(6115) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR. BHARAT VYAS, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER/PP(99) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED BY DS(65) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
Date : 17/10/2018
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted that there are as many as 11 to 12 offences, under which, the petitioner is arraigned and the authority is, at present, considering the proposal but till date no order is passed against the petitioner. In view of the above statement since no order is passed against the petitioner, learned advocate for the petitioner does not press this petition.
In view of the above, the present petition disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Adinterim relief granted earlier, stands vacated.
(A.J. SHASTRI, J)
VISHAL MISHRA
Page 1 of 1
Salim @ Toto Shakilbhai Ansari
State of Gujarat
A.J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
