Oral order dismissing a special civil application under Rule 15 of the Gujarat High Court Rules, 1988, for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel in the third round of arguments.
The matter was dismissed for want of prosecution; rule discharged; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/2960/2008 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2960 of 2008
==========================================================
DINESHBHAI PRUTHVISINH KHANT
Versus
JOINT POLICE COMMISSIONER (ADMINISTRATION)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MAHENDRA K PATEL(1591) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR BHARGAV PANDYA, AGP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 RULE SERVED(64) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI
Date : 10/12/2018
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called out even in the third
round, learned advocate for the petitioner is not
present nor any mentioning is made on his behalf.
Therefore, the Court is constrained to dismiss the
matter for want of prosecution.
Hence, the matter is dismissed for want of
prosecution. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if
any, granted earlier stands vacated.
(A.J. SHASTRI, J)
V.J. SATWARA
Page 1 of 1
Dineshbhai Pruthvisinh Khant
Joint Police Commissioner (Administration)
A.J. Shastri
V.J. Satwara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court