The application was dismissed as infructuous because the respondents had complied with the Court's directions after the application was filed.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/624/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 624 of 2018
==========================================================
PRADIPKUMAR RAMANLAL VAYEDA
Versus
VIKRAMSINH JADEJA (RETIRED)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAV C THAKKAR(2206) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MR KM ANTANI, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 29/06/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY)
It is represented on behalf of the applicant that after filing of this Misc. Civil Application, the respondents have complied the directions issued by this Court. As such, the subject-matter of this application has become infructuous.
In view of such statement, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
(R.SUBHASH REDDY, CJ)
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
A.M. PIRZADA
Page 1 of 1
PRADIPKUMAR RAMANLAL VAYEDA
VIKRAMSINH JADEJA
R. Subhash Reddy
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
