Nasir Abbas Pinjari v. Ankur Patel
Case brief
What is this about?
Nil. This order dismisses an application not pressed by counsel who stated the respondent complied with the FIR registration direction.
Nil. This order dismisses an application not pressed by counsel who stated the respondent complied with the FIR registration direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/MCA/565/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 565 of 2018
==========================================================
NASIR ABBAS PINJARI
Versus
ANKUR PATEL
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR KM ANTANI, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 05/05/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. R.SUBHASH REDDY)
It is represented by learned counsel for the applicant that the respondent has complied the direction issued by this Court by registering the FIR.
In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application. The application is dismissed as not pressed.
(R.SUBHASH REDDY, CJ)
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
A.M. PIRZADA
Page 1 of 1
Nasir Abbas Pinjari
Ankur Patel
R.Subhash Reddy
Vipul M. Pancholi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court