The applicant sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application. The High Court granted permission, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, vacated any interim relief, and noted liberty to pursue other remedies.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/4144/2012 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 4144 of 2012
==========================================================
DIPTIBEN P GANDHI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HARDIK A DAVE(3764) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MR MITUL K SHELAT(2419) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 4 NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 3 MS KRINA CALLA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI Date : 13/12/2018 ORAL ORDER
After arguing for some time, learned advocate
Mr.Hardik A. Dave for the applicant seeks permission
to withdraw the present petition.
Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The
petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. Rule is
discharged. Interim relief granted earlier, if any,
shall stand vacated.
It is needless to say that the applicant shall
be at liberty to avail any other appropriate remedy
that may be permissible under the law.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI, J)
piyush
Page 1 of 1
Diptiben P Gandhi
State of Gujarat
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court