No petitioner present despite twice calling. High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application for default as the decision challenged (October 2016) no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/17377/2013 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17377 of 2013
================================================================
CHIRAG SHAILESHKUAMR PATEL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR M.IQBAL A SHAIKH(3510) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(3) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2 MS KRINA CALLA, APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
Date : 03/12/2018
ORAL ORDER
None is present though the matter is called out twice. As per the office report, the Criminal Case pending before the District Court, Nadiad has already been disposed of by the order dated 28.10.2016.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for default and as does not survive.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI, J)
SINDHU NAIR
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a criminal miscellaneous application that does not survive due to judgment under challenge having expired
Chirag Shaileshkumar Patel
State of Gujarat
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
