In this oral order, the Gujarat High Court rejected an application for bail/cr.mis.appeal considering the applicants antecedents, noting that the judge was not inclined to exercise discretion in his favour.
Application rejected; the applicant was not granted bail or any other relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/14442/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 14442 of 2018
==========================================================
IRFAN MOHAMMED RAEESBHAI QURESHI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance:
O I PATHAN(7684) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR. RAKESH PATEL, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
Date : 10/08/2018
ORAL ORDER
Having regard to the antecedents of the applicantaccused, I am not inclined to exercise my discretion in his favour. Hence, rejected.
(J.B.PARDIWALA, J)
Vahid
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant accused should be granted bail in the pending criminal matter.
IRFAN MOHAMMED RAEESBHAI QURESHI
STATE OF GUJARAT
J.B. Pardiwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
