6.0. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties at length. Considering the impugned FIR and averments and allegations made in the complaint, more particularly, against the applicants herein. On considering the entire FIR and averments and allegations made against the applicants, it appears that there are general allegations against the applicants. In the FIR, it is alleged that as complainant was not talking to the applicant no.1- her sister in law, which was not like by the husband and therefore, the husband had beaten the complainant once. Except the above, there are no any allegations against the applicant no.1 at all. So far as allegation against applicant no.2 are concerned, it appears that some general and vague allegations are made against the applicant no.2 that she was instigating the husband for taking divorce from the complainant and to sell the property. Considering the averments and allegations against the applicants, it cannot be said that any offence under Sections 323, 504, 506(2), 498-A and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act as alleged have been constituted. Considering the averments and allegations in the complaint, it appears that there was a matrimonial dispute between husband and wife and considering the fact that even the applicants had married much prior to marriage between complainant and her husband and that they were living at their matrimonial houses since last 12 years, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned FIR at least against the applicants is nothing but abuse of process of Court and law. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash and set aside the impugned FIR.
