Allowed

Mohamadnasir Daudbhai Qureshi v. State of Gujarat

Gujarat HC24 Jun 2014SCA/3506/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a special civil application challenging a detention order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act. It quashed the order, holding that recording satisfaction of the petitioner being a 'cruel person' based on a single offence was illegal, as the statutory definition requires habitual involvement.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order of detention dated 24/01/2014 is quashed and set aside; the detenu is to be set at liberty forthwith if not detained for another case.

Mohamadnasir Daudbhai Qureshi Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Gujarat HC (2014)

¶1

C/SCA/3506/2014 JUDGMENT

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3506 of 2014

¶4

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

¶5

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH

¶6

================================================================

¶7

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

¶8

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

¶9

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?

¶10

4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?

¶11

5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?

¶12

================================================================

¶13

MOHAMADNASIR DAUDBHAI QURESHI....Petitioner(s)

¶14

Versus

¶15

STATE OF GUJARAT & 2....Respondent(s)

¶16

================================================================

¶17

Appearance:

¶18

MR ATIT THAKOR FOR MR A R SHAIKH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No.

¶19

¶20

MR BIPIN BHATT, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 , 3 RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2

¶21

================================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH

¶23

Date : 24/06/2014 ORAL JUDGMENT

¶24

By way of this petition, the detenu has

¶25

Page 1 of 4

¶26

C/SCA/3506/2014 JUDGMENT

¶27

challenged the order of detention dated
24/01/2014 passed by respondent No.2 herein under
the provisions of sub-sec(2) of Section 3 of the
Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act,
1985 (hereinafter referred to as “PASA Act”).

¶28

2 Learned advocate, Mr.Thakor, appearing for the
petitioner-detenu has invited my attention to the
order of detention dated 24/1/2014, by which, the
detenu was arrested and sent to Bhuj Jail. The
ground of detaining the accused is that one
offence was registered against the petitioner
under the provisions of Sections 5, 6, 8 and 10
of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1954;
Section 11-E, L of the Bombay Cattle Prohibition
Act, 1960 and Section 119 of the GP Act. He is,
therefore, a “cruel person” as defined under
Section 2(bbb) of the PASA Act. Learned advocate
appearing for the petitioner has submitted that,
except this solitary offence, there is no
material with the detaining authority to detain
the petitioner under the provisions of the PASA
Act. It is submitted that the order is vitiated
because only on the basis of one offence
registered against the petitioner, and in absence
of any other material to show involvement of the
petitioner in similar activities, the detaining
authority has recorded a subjective satisfaction
that the petitioner is a cruel person. The
definition of cruel person requires habitual

¶29

Page 2 of 4

¶30

C/SCA/3506/2014 JUDGMENT

¶31

involvement and, therefore, the subjective
satisfaction and the consequential order are
vitiated.

¶32

3 Learned AGP Ms. Desai, appearing for the State
has opposed this petition.

¶33

4 Having regard to the contentions raised on
behalf of the petitioner, it would be necessary
to refer to the definition of “cruel person” as
given in Section 2(bbb) of the Gujarat Prevention
of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985, which runs as
under:-

¶34

“2(bbb) “cruel person” means a person who either
by himself or as member or leader of a gang
habitually commits or attempts to commit abets
the commission of an offence punishable under
Section 8 of the Bombay Animal Preservation Act,
1954 (Bom.LXXII of 1954)”.

¶35

5 It is clear from reading of the definition that
the person to be branded as a cruel person has to
be either a member or leader of a gang habitually
committing or attempting to commit or abetting
the commission of offence punishable under
Section 8 of the Bombay Animal Preservation Act,
1954. The term “habitually” examined from any
angle, literal or legal, would require presence
of an element of repetitiveness. In the instant
case, barring one offence registered against the
petitioner, there was no material before the
detaining authority to record a satisfaction that

¶36

Page 3 of 4

¶37

C/SCA/3506/2014 JUDGMENT

¶38

the petitioner is habitual or repetitively
involved in the offence.

¶39

6 Under the circumstances, the subjective
satisfaction that the petitioner is a cruel
person on the basis of which he has been detained
is vitiated.

¶40

7 In view of the above facts and circumstances
of the case, the petition is allowed. The
impugned order of detention dated 24/01/2014
passed by respondent No.2 herein is hereby
quashed and set aside. The detenu is ordered to
be set at liberty forthwith if he is not required
to be detained in connection with any other case.
Rule is made absolute accordingly. Direct Service
is permitted.

¶41

(S.G.SHAH, J.)

¶42

binoy

¶43

Page 4 of 4

Mohamadnasir Daudbhai Qureshi v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamadnasir Daudbhai Qureshi v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Shanabhai Chavda Vs Police Commissioner

Dharmendra @ Dhamo Ravindrabhai Dube Vs State of Gujarat

Kalubhai Mohammedbhai Shaikh Vs State of Gujarat

Rajesh Samatbhai Bariya Vs State of Gujarat

Prabhat @ Pintoo Bachubhai Lodha Vs Commissioner of Police

Imrankhan S/O Anwarkhan Pathan Vs State of Gujarat