5. Shri A.D. Oza, learned Government Pleader has made number of submissions on merits with regard to the nature of work being performed by concerned workman and that they have not completed 240 days in the last preceding year, and/or even with regard to juniors being continued and/or alleged breach of Sections 25(F), (G) and (H). He has relied upon the documentary evidence at Exhs. 20, 134 and 260 in support of his submission that none of the workmen has completed more than 240 days and that the finding given by the Labour Court is contrary to the evidence on record. He has submitted that the Labour Court has given the finding with regard to completion of 240 days mainly on the ground that the petitioner has not produced the relevant documents to prove the contents of the documents at Exhs. 20, 134 and 260 and shifting the onus upon the petitioner. He has relied upon the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan State Ganganagar S. Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another, reported in (2004) 8 SCC Page 161; in the case of Municipal Corporation, Faridabad Vs. Shri Niwas, reported in (2004) 8 SCC Page 195; and in the case of Rajasthan State Ganganagar S. Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another, reported in AIR 2005 Supreme Court Weekly 3160, in support of his
