GST Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling — February 2020
February 2020
16 orders, most recent first
Karnataka Food & Civil Supplies Corporation · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 112/2019 dated 30-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismis
Chowgule & Co. P. Ltd. · The ruling given by AAR-Goa being consistent with the extend statue is maintained. The appeal is rejected.
Syngenta Biosciences P. L. · The decision of the AAR Goa in the present case is consistent with and based on a fair, proper interpretation of the extend statutory provisions, and hence requires to be maintained as legal and proper.
Sri DMS Hospitality Private Limited · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 86/2019 dated 25-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on al
Rajendran Santhosh · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 64/2019 dated 20-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accounts.
Manipal Energy & Infratech Ltd · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 111/2019 dated 30-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all ac
Ascendas Services (India) Pvt.Ltd · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 114/2019 dated 30-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all
Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. · The order No KAR ADRG 88/2019 dated 26.09.2019 passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling is declared voidable initio as it was vitiated by the process of suppression of material facts
Informatics Publishing Ltd. · The appellate authority for advance ruling set aside the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide KAR/ADRG 74/2019 Dated: 23rd Sept 2019 i.e. Appellant appeal is allowed. The question on whic
M/s Rich Diary Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. · Appellate Tribunal does not find any reason to interfere with the order of Tamil Nadu Advance Ruling Authority in the matter.
Cartus India Private Ltd. · The appellate authority has modified the Advance Ruling Order No KAR/ADRG 92/2019 dated 27th Sept 2019 as follows: The package of bundled services supplied by the appellant for a single price in terms of the RSA
Vertiv Energy Pvt. Ltd. · The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, hereby, modify the AAR ruling to the extent that the supplies under question would not be considered as “Composite Supply” in terms of section 2(30) read with section 2(9
Volvo-Eicher Commercial Vehicles Ltd. · a) The appellate authority for advance ruling set aside the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO. KAR.ADRG 32/2019 dated 12-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is allowe
Tarun Realtors Pvt. Ltd. · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 103/2019 dated 30-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accounts
International Flower Auction Bangalore Ltd. · The appellate authority for advance ruling set aside the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR.ADRG 87/2019 dated 26-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the department appeal
Manipal Technologies Limited · The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 35/2019 dated 16-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accou