Faizur Rahman Talukdar and 10 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

¶1

Page No.# 1/5

¶2

GAHC010286102023

¶3

2026:GAU-AS:7639

¶4

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/7488/2023

¶6

FAIZUR RAHMAN TALUKDAR AND 10 ORS S/O LT. KURSHID ALI VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶7

2: HUSSAIN AHMED S/O LT. SABBIR AHMED VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶8

3: ABDUL BASIT S/O LT. SABBIR AHMED VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶9

4: ASAD UDDIN S/O LT. SABBIR AHMED VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶10

5: HARUN AHMED

¶11

Page No.# 2/5

¶12

S/O LT. SABBIR AHMED VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶13

6: GULJAR HUSSAIN S/O LT. ATAUR RAHMAN VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶14

7: ABDUL MANAF S/O LT. IBRAHIM ALI VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶15

8: ABDUL WAHAB S/O LT. ABDUL KADIR VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶16

9: KHATUN BIBI W/O FAIZUR RAHMAN TALUKDAR VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶17

10: HALIMA BEGUM D/O SABBIR AHMED VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶18

11: SAYRUN NESSA

¶19

Page No.# 3/5

¶20

D/O SUNA MIA VILL-KHAGAIL P.O.-JADUTILA DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788720

¶21

VERSUS

¶22

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KARIMGANJ P.O. AND DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788710 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER NILAMBAZAR REVENUE CIRCLE P.O.-NILAMBAZAR DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788722 -----------Advocate for : MR B SINHA Advocate for : SC REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

¶23

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Date : 02-06-2026

¶26

Heard Mr. H. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

¶27

Page No.# 4/5

¶28

2. Considering the simple nature of the prayer made in this writ petition and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage.

¶29

3. The petitioners, 11 (eleven) in numbers, by filing this writ petition have prayed for a simple direction to the respondent authorities to dispose of the application dated 18.03.2023, submitted by them, in respect of the land measuring 6.09 acre (16 Bigha) covered by Dag No.238(0)/218(n) under Taluk No.15691/104 of Mohammad Kabir, Final Khatian No.102 of Mouza-Khagail, Ph-Eagarsati within Nilambazar Revenue Circle, in the Karimganj District, presently Sribhumi District.

¶30

4. The petitioners, who claim to be the surviving legal heirs of late Kurshid Ali, S/o Lt. Anfor Ali; late Sabbir Ahmed, S/o Lt. Abdul Kadir; late Ataur Rahman, S/o Lt. Abdul Kadir; late Ibrahim Ali, S/o Lt. Jalal Uddin; late Abdul Kadir, S/o Lt. Arzid Ali; and late Suna Mia, S/o Lt. Katu Mia, state that their grandfathers were in occupation and possession of the land measuring 6.09 acre (16 Bigha) covered by Dag No.238(0)/218(n) under Taluk No.15691/104 of Mohammad Kabir, Final Khatian No.102 of Mouza-Khagail, Ph-Eagarsati, in the erstwhile District of Cachar, then under Karimganj District and now Sribhumi District. It is stated that the said predecessors were recorded as Rayot under Khatian No.102.

¶31

5. According to the petitioners, they inherited the subject land after the demise of their fathers and grandfathers. The petitioners applied for inclusion of their names in the Khatian; however, the respondent authorities, without considering the grievance of the petitioners regarding recording of their names, recorded the subject land as Khas land. It is the

¶32

Page No.# 5/5

¶33

contention of the petitioners that they have right to have their names recorded in the revenue records in accordance with the provisions of the Assam State Acquisition of Zamindaries Act, 1951, which was applicable in the erstwhile District of Cachar. Therefore, they submit that their application dated 18.03.2023 may be directed to be considered and disposed of.

¶34

6. Having considered the simple nature of the prayer made by the petitioners for disposal of their application for recording their names in the revenue records in terms of the applicable provisions of law and as agreed to by the learned counsels for the respondents, Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue Department and Mr. H. Sarma, learned State Counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioners to file an application before the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, within a period of 20 (twenty) days from today. On receipt of the application, the District Commissioner, Sribhumi District, shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of the application.

¶35

7. The writ petition stands disposed of, in terms above.

¶36

JUDGE

¶37

Comparing Assistant

Faizur Rahman Talukdar and 10 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faizur Rahman Talukdar and 10 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Bhushan Chandra Deka Vs the Union of India and 3 Ors.

H. Debasish Singha and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 7 Ors.

Smt Sabijan Bibi Vs Jamila Bibi and Ors.

Hussain Ahmed Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Azizur Rahman and 3 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Japir Ali and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.