Mafir Uddin and 4 Ors. v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010260472024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH…
GAHC010260472024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010260472024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/6624/2024
MAFIR UDDIN AND 4 ORS. S/O- ASMAT ALI, R/O- CHAKUMAKU, JAGIROAD, MORIGAON, CHAKUMAKU, MARIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782410.
2: SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O- NABI HUSSAIN R/O- CHAKUMAKU MARIGAON DIST. MARIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782410. 3: JAHED ALI S/O- ABBAS ALI R/O- CHENIMARI KAKARJALA MARIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782410. 4: ATUL CH. BISWAS S/O- HASI RAM BISWAS R/O- NEAR MANDIR CHAKUMAKU JAGIROAD MAYONG MARIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782410. 5: HAMIDUL ISLAM S/O- AIB ALI R/O- VILL.- SIDHAGURI 1 NO. BURGAON DIST. MARIGAON ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3
PIN- 782411
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 3:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 4:DHRUBA RAJBANSHI RESIDENT OF BHETAPARA HOUSING COLONY GUWAHATI-781028 ASSAM 5:TGJ ENTERPRISE REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR DHRULAV CHANDRA DEKA SAWKUCHI GUWAHATI-781040. 6:DHANTI GOSWAMI M.G. TOWER 3RD FLOOR BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781028
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, MRS. R S DEURI,MR R ALI,MR D S DEKA,MS A DAS,MS. L WANGSA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, GMC
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 14.09.2026
Mr. U. Bharadwaj, learned counsel, appearing on instructions of Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel, for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners desire not to press the matter any further. Accordingly, he prays that, he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition.
Prayer accepted.
In view of the above submission, made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Mafir Uddin and 4 Ors.
The State of Assam and 5 Ors.
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court