M/s Oishy Enterprise v. the State of Ap and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC040001562023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC040001562023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040001562023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/58/2023
M/s Oishy Enterprise Represented by its Proprietor Shri Angkin Lego, S/o Shri Ngangin Lego, R/o Village Yagpo, Pasighat, PO/PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Cont. No 919436807127
VERSUS
THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. Represented by the Secretary, Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairperson Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Chief Executive Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak, Tsering Gyatso,Amy Talom,Tumba Ango Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), N Khera
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 14.09.2026
Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2; and Mr. N. Khera, learned counsel for respondent No. 3, submit that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s Oishy Enterprise Represented by its Proprietor Shri Angkin Lego
THE STATE OF AP
Secretary, Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar
Deputy Commissioner cum Chairperson, Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation
Chief Executive Officer, Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation
KARDAK ETE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court