The Gauhati High Court heard a writ petition where the petitioner's counsel submitted that relevant documents were inadvertently omitted. The court dismissed the writ petition upon its withdrawal, granting the petitioners liberty to do so.
The writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010193552026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/5062/2026
SHELLY BEGUM LASKAR AND 3 ORS
S/O. RAFIQUL HASSAN LASKAR, R/O. VILLAGE TUNDURKANDI, WARD NO. 11, P.O. SONAIMUK, P.S. SONAI, PIN CODE 788 119 DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM.
2: SRI RAJU BANIK S/O. LATE GOBARDHAN BANIK R/O. TARANI ROAD WARD NO. 20 SILCHAR TOWN P.S. SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM.
3: SRI SAJU BANIK S/O. LATE GOBARDHAN BANIK R/O. TARANI ROAD WARD NO. 20 SILCHAR TOWN P.S. SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM
4: GOBINDA BANIK S/O. LATE GOBARDHAN BANIK R/O. TARANI ROAD WARD NO. 20 SILCHAR TOWN P.S. SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. PIN CODE 788001
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SILCHAR REVENUE CIRCLE DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. PIN CODE 788119
4:THE SUB-REGISTRAR SILCHAR O/O. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. PIN CODE 788001 5:THE NODAL OFFICER INTER RELIGION LAND SALE PERMISSION REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI - 78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAJUMDAR, MR. JUNM LASKAR,MS. J GHOSH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
18.09.2026
Ms. J. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that certain relevant documents are not annexed along with the writ petition inadvertently. Therefore, the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition with liberty.
Mr. S.S. Roy, learned State Counsel and Mr. J. Handique, learned Standing Counsel,
Page No.# 3/3
Revenue Department are present.
In view of the above submission made by Ms. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
SHELLY BEGUM LASKAR AND 3 ORS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
MANISH CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
