Jitendra Nath Sarma v. the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Gauhati High Court order dated 13.02.2026 in WP(C)/477/2026 (Jitendra Nath Sarma, represented by attorney holder Subimal Chakraborty, v. State of Assam and 3 Ors — District Magistrate and Collector; Additional District Commissioner (Land Acquisition Officer); Circle Officer, Azara Revenue Circle). Counsel: M.M. Zaman for the petitioner; J. Handique, Govt. Advocate, and G. Hazarika, Standing Counsel, for the respondents. Bench: Devashis Baruah, J. Disposition: writ petition closed as infructuous on the petitioner's counsel stating that the petitioner had received the dues; no merits adjudication, no statutes or precedents discussed, no quantum stated.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has received the dues, and the petition stands closed. ¶24