Dismissed¶27

Sahar Ali v. Union of India and 6 Ors.

Gauhati HC3 Feb 2026WP(C)/4318/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-prosecution dismissal of writ petition WP(C)/4318/2019 (Sahar Ali v. Union of India and 6 Ors.), Gauhati High Court, order dated 04.02.2026; petitioner absent on 21.01.2026 and on date of order; interim bail of 19.08.2019 vacated; Registry to hold Tribunal records 30 days then return to concerned Tribunal; respondents include State of Assam, ADGP (Border), Election Commission of India, NRC State Co-ordinator, Deputy Commissioner Kamrup, SP (Border) Kamrup; neutral citation 2026:GAU-AS:1419.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution, the petitioner having failed to appear on call despite a prior warning issued on 21.01.2026. ¶27

Sahar Ali Vs Union of India and 6 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010140812019

2026:GAU-AS:1419

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/4318/2019

¶6

SAHAR ALI

¶7

S/O LT. FAKAR UDDIN, R/O VILL. NO. 1 TAKEYAMARI, P.O. GUABARI P.S. GOSSAIGAON, DIST.-KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783360

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.

¶10

REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT. NORTH BLOCK,NEW DELHI-1

¶11

2:THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶12

TO BE REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

¶13

3:ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM (BORDER) BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-05

¶14

4:ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY SECRETARY NIRVASAN SADAN NEW DELHI-1

¶15

5:NATIONAL REGISTRAR OF CITIZENS (NRC) STATE CO-ORDINATOR ACHUYT PLAZA BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5 ASSAM

¶16

Page No.# 2/3

¶17

6:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP ASSAM GHY-1

¶18

7:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) KAMRUP ASSAM GHY-

¶19

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A S TAPADER, MR M AHMED,MR. N AHMED,MR. D HUSSAIN

¶20

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, ECI,SC, NRC,SC, F.T

¶21

BEFORE

¶22

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Date : 04.02.2026 (K.R. Surana, J)

¶25

None appears for the petitioner on call. However, all the respondents are represented.

¶26

The petitioner was also absent when the matter was previously listed on 21.01.2026 and the on the said date the Court had observed that if the petitioner is not represented on the next date of listing, appropriate orders will be passed.

¶27

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim bail granted by order dated 19.08.2019 is hereby vacated. The Registry shall retain the records of the Tribunal for 30 (thirty) days from the

¶28

Page No.# 3/3

¶29

date of the order, thereafter return the record to the concerned Tribunal along with a copy of the order to be made a part record by the learned Tribunal.

¶30

JUDGE JUDGE

¶31

Comparing Assistant

Sahar Ali v. Union of India and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahar Ali v. Union of India and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jarifuddin Ahmed @ Md. Jurubuddin Vs the Union of India and 4 Ors.

Easin Ali @ Eyachin Ali Vs the Union of India and 5 Ors.

Musstt Nureza Begum Vs the Union of India and Othrs

Smti Phuholi Sema Vs Kuhupuyo Puro and Anr.

The Union of India and 2 Ors. Vs Bal Krishnan Sharma and 16 Ors.

Moynul Hoque Vs the Union of India and 5 Ors.