Dismissed¶32

Dipak Chandra Deka v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Gauhati HC2 Jun 2026WP(C)/4095/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court WP(C)/4095/2021, Dipak Chandra Deka v. State of Assam and 5 Ors.; respondents included State Level and District Level Committees for selection of candidates for appointment on compassionate ground under Public Works Department (PWD), Assam; counsel S. Islam (for A. Razzak) sought withdrawal as matter became infructuous; Standing Counsel B. Choudhury (PWD) and Government Advocate H. K. Hazarika (State) heard; order dated 03.06.2026 by Justice Kaushik Goswami; prayer allowed; writ petition dismissed on being withdrawn; no statutes or precedents cited; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition allowed ('Prayer is allowed.'); petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶32

Dipak Chandra Deka Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010122732021

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/4095/2021

¶6

DIPAK CHANDRA DEKA

¶7

S/O LATE NANDIRAM DEKA, R/O VILL. GAKHIRKHOWA PARA, P.O. JANARAMCHOWKA, P.S. MANGALDAI, DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN 784529

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

¶10

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006

¶11

2:THE DEPUTY SECY. OT THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

¶12

PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006

¶13

3:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR SELECTION OF CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUD UNDER PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT.

¶14

ASSAM

¶15

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006

¶16

4:THE CHAIRMAN

¶17

STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR SELECTION OF CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND UNDER PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. ASSAM

Page No.# 2/3

DISPUR

GUWAHATI 781006

5:THE DIST. LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR SELECTION OF CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND UNDER PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. MANGALDAI DARRANG REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECY.

¶22

6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

¶23

DARRANG ASSAM

¶24

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BANIK, MR A RAZZAK

¶25

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, GA, ASSAM

¶26

Page No.# 3/3

¶27

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

¶28

ORDER

¶29

Date : 03.06.2026

¶30

Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Razzak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the PWD and Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent.

¶31

Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter in the meantime has become infructuous and accordingly seeks withdrawal of the same.

¶32

Prayer is allowed.

¶33

Resultantly, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn.

¶34

JUDGE

¶35

Comparing Assistant

Dipak Chandra Deka v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Chandra Deka v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Saptagon Asia Private Limited Vs the Union of India

M/S Khanna Designers and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Union of India and Othrs

Sanjib Kumar Das Vs the State of Assam and Ors.

Md. Khalil Ahmed Talukdar and 80 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Moynal Hoque Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Satya Nath Narah and 4 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.