Disposed¶26

Fazlul Hoque Mondal v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.

Gauhati HC15 Jun 2026WP(C)/2713/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court; WP(C)/2713/2024; Fazlul Hoque Mondal v. State of Assam & 6 Ors.; Kardak Ete, J.; withdrawal of writ petition with liberty; DISE Data wrong entry 2006-07 and 2015-18; Assistant Teacher; Jorshimuly Purana Kuchia M.E. Madrassa; Sarva Siksha Abhiyan (SSA); Director of Elementary Education Assam; NIEPA; writ jurisdiction declined for declaration of corrected data entry; liberty to approach appropriate forum; liberty to approach this Court again.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition permitted to be withdrawn and closed with liberty to approach the appropriate Forum for the declaration sought; petitioner at liberty to approach this Court again as may be advised. ¶26

Fazlul Hoque Mondal Vs the State of Assam and 6 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010095552024

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/2713/2024

¶6

FAZLUL HOQUE MONDAL S/O- LATE KUDRAT ALI AHMED, R/O- VILLAGE- NO.2, DAKSHIN RANGAPANI, P.O.- BADLA BAZAR, DIST.- KAMRUP(R), ASSAM. PIN- 781127.

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY-06.

¶9

2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19.

¶10

3:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KAMRUP DISTRICT- KAMRUP ASSAM.

¶11

4:THE STATE LEVEL SELECTION COMMITTEE KAMRUP REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON I.E. DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM

¶12

KAHILIPARA GHY-19.

¶13

Page No.# 2/3

¶14

5:THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (NIEPA) REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN

¶15

MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SHASTRI BHAWAN RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD NEW DELHI- 110001. 6:THE MISSION DIRECTOR ASSAM SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN MISSION SSA AND DPEP KAHILIPARA GUWAHATIC/O- THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19. 7:THE HEADMASTER JORSHIMULI PURAN KUCHIA M.E. MADRASSA SITUATED AT VILLAGE- PURAN KUSHIA

¶16

P.O.- TAPARPATHAR P.S.- CHAYGAON DISTRICT- KAMRUP(R) PIN- 781137

¶17

Advocate for the Petitioner : G UDDIN, P ADHIKARI,MR A K AZAD

¶18

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, DY.S.G.I.,SC, SSA

¶19

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Date : 16.06.2026

¶22

Page No.# 3/3

¶23

After arguing the matter at some length, Mr. G. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate Forum for a declaration that the name of Fazal Hoque has been wrongly mentioned in the DISE Data since 2006-07 and 2015-18 in place of the petitioner namely Fazlul Hoque Mondal, who has been serving as Assistant Teacher in the Jorshimuly Purana Kuchia MEM.

¶24

Mr. G. Pegu, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department and Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, SSA are present.

¶25

Having considered the claim of the petitioner to the effect that one Fazal Hoque has been wrongly entered in the DISE Data in place of the petitioner namely, Fazlul Hoque Mondal since 2006-07 to 2015-2018, this Court is loath to decide the claim while exercising the writ jurisdiction, and thus, prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate Forum is accepted.

¶26

Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed with liberty as prayed for.

¶27

The petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court again as may be advised.

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Comparing Assistant

Fazlul Hoque Mondal v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fazlul Hoque Mondal v. the State of Assam and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sibendra Nath Roy and 13 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 9 Ors.

Sibendra Nath Roy and 11 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Lavita Talukdar and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 6 Ors.

Md. Mofizul Hoque Vs the State of Assam and 4 Ors.

Sithi Suklabaidya @ Sithi Rani Suklabaidya Vs Nisarg Hivare and Ors.

Smt. Debajani Dihingia and 3 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.