Disposed

Dr Shajidur Rahman Mollah v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Gauhati HC7 Jun 2026WP(C)/2712/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A college lecturer sought provincialization of his service despite a State Level Screening Committee recommendation in his favour. His representation was pending before the Higher Education Department; the writ petition was confined to seeking its disposal. The High Court directed respondent No. 2 to decide the representation within one month after hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Commissioner and Secretary, Higher Education Department, Assam to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2026 within one month after opportunity of hearing and communicate dec

Dr Shajidur Rahman Mollah Vs the State of Assam and… — Education and Admissions | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010100042026

2026:GAU-AS:7931

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/2712/2026

¶6

DR SHAJIDUR RAHMAN MOLLAH

¶7

S/O- LATE HAJI KOBAD HUSSAIN MOLLAH VILL- GAURIPUR WARD NO. 4 P.O- GAURIPUR P.S- GAURIPUR DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM PIN- 783331.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

¶10

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-06

¶11

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY-06

¶12

3:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT CUM CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE (SLSC) ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19.

¶13

4:THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION CUM MEMBER SECRETARY STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE SLSC ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19.

¶14

5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

¶15

DHUBRI CUM CHAIRMAN DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE DSC DHUBRI ASSAM

¶16

6:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DHUBRI DISTRICT CIRCLE DHUBRI CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE DHUBRI ASSAM

¶17

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL, MR K ISLAM,MR A ALIM SK,MR. A W MONDAL

¶18

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, HIGHER EDU

¶19

Page No.# 2/4

¶20

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Date : 08.06.2026

¶23

Heard Mr. Mohar Uddin Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A. Phukan, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 5; and Mr. S. Bhuyan, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 2, 3 & 4.

¶24

2. The case of the petitioner is that he has been serving as a Lecturer in the Department of Political Science in Dhubri Girls’ College, Dhubri, w.e.f. 05.08.2008, having been appointed by the Governing Body of the said College on 04.08.2008.

¶25

3. It is submitted that by Minutes dated 10.07.2023, adopted by the State Level Screening Committee, the name of the petitioner was recommended for provincialization in the said Dhubri Girls’ College, Dhubri, based on the verification report dated 10.03.2023 submitted by the Screening Committee, Assam, whereby, it is stated that the Masters Degree and the Ph.D. Degree acquired by the petitioner, was found to be in order and he is eligible for provincialization as a Tutor Assistant Professor of the said College as per the provisions of the Assam Education (Provincialization of Services of Teachers and Re-organization of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017(amended in 2018).

¶26

4. However, despite the recommendation of the State Level Screening Committee for provincialization of the service of the petitioner in the year 2023, his service has not yet been provincialized whereas the service of other teaching and non-teaching staff of Dhubri Girls’ College, Dhubri, has been already provincialized.

¶27

Page No.# 3/4

¶28

5. By way of filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to provincialize his service as Assistant Professor of Dhubri Girls’ College, Dhubri, w.e.f. 01.01.2021, in terms of the Screening Committee report dated 10.03.2023 and State Level Screening Committee’s recommendation dated 10.07.2023, in compliance of the provisions of Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 13 and 14, of the Assam Education (Provincialization of Services of Teachers and Reorganization of Educational Institutions) Act, 2017(amended in 2018).

¶29

6. However, at the outset, Mr. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that being aggrieved by non-consideration of his case for provincialization, the petitioner has already preferred an appeal/ representation before the Commissioner and Secretary, Higher Education Department, Assam, on 11.05.2026, which is pending disposal before the said authority.

¶30

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 11.05.2026, ventilating his grievances regarding non-provincialization of his service despite the recommendation of the State Level Screening Committee dated 10.07.2023, it is submitted that the said appeal/representation is pending disposal before the authority concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, confine the prayer in the present writ petition to direct the respondent authorities to consider and dispose of the said appeal/representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time-bound period.

¶31

8. Mr. Bhuyan, learned standing counsel, Higher Education Department, has no objection to the above prayer of the petitioner to the extent that his representation dated 11.05.2026, be disposed of, however, by granting sufficient time for such disposal.

¶32

Page No.# 4/4

¶33

9. In view of the above, and as agreed upon by the learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the petitioner’s claim; this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities concerned, more particularly, the respondent No. 2 viz. Commissioner and Secretary, Higher Education Department, Assam, to consider and dispose of the appeal/representation dated 11.05.2026, submitted by the petitioner for provincialization of his service as Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science in Dhubri Girls’ College, Dhubri, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if so required.

¶34

10. Such exercise be completed within a period of 1(one) month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶35

11. The decision so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.

¶36

12. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of at the motion stage itself.

¶37

JUDGE

¶38

Comparing Assistant

Dr Shajidur Rahman Mollah v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Shajidur Rahman Mollah v. the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Iman Ali Ahmed and Ors. Vs Narayan Konwar, IAS

Khalilur Rahman Dewan Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Jutika Boro Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Dr. Biren Bhuyan, M.Sc., Ph.D. Vs Phanindra Jidung and Ors.

Dr Mazibar Rahman Prodhani Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

Mazibar Rahman Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.