Disposed¶24

Syed Fiddusar Rahman v. the State of Assam and 9 Ors.

Gauhati HC17 Mar 2026WP(C)/237/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file afresh; Gauhati High Court; WP(C)/237/2020; Syed Fiddusar Rahman v. State of Assam and others; Elementary Education Department, Assam; Secondary Education; BTC/BTAD; Inspector of Schools and District Elementary Education Officer, Baksa; Betna Kaurbaha Mila High School, Bhogpur, Baksa; order dated 18-03-2026 by Justice Kardak Ete; disposal on withdrawal, no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted, with liberty to file afresh. ¶24

Syed Fiddusar Rahman Vs the State of Assam and 9 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010007412020

2026:GAU-AS:3941

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : WP(C)/237/2020

¶6

SYED FIDDUSAR RAHMAN

¶7

S/O- KHABIRUDDIN AHMED, R/O- VILL. NO. 2 GORESWAR, P.O. NO. 2 GORESWAR, P.S. GORESWAR, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN- 781366.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.- 781006

¶10

2:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-06.

¶11

3:THE SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-6.

¶12

4:THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GHY.-19. 5:THE DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.-19.

¶13

Page No.# 2/3

¶14

6:THE DY. SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-06. 7:THE SECY. EDUCATION BTAD KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370. 8:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BTAD KOKRAJHAR PIN- 783370. 9:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BTAD DISTRICT BAKSA PIN- 781371. 10:THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BTAD DISTRICT BAKSA PIN -781373. 11:BETNA KAURBAHA MILA HIGH SCHOOL VILLAGE- BHOGPUR P.O. BHOGPUR DIST. BAKSA B.T.A.D. ASSAM PIN- 781366 REPRESENTED BY ITS I/C HEADMASTER SRI SANJAY KALITA

¶15

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R C SAIKIA, MS. N DEY,MR. M K CHOUDHURY,MS. K SAIKIA,MR S DAS,MR G BARUAH,MS N DAS

¶16

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR A DASGUPTA,J U AHMED,MR S R NAWAZ (R-11),MR J U AHMED (R-11),MR. U. SARMA, SC, SEC. EDU.,SC, BTC

¶17

Page No.# 3/3

¶18

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Date : 18-03-2026

¶21

Heard Mr. J. B. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh.

¶22

Mr. P. N. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department; Mr. U. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education; Ms. N. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, BTC and Mr. J. U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent No. 11, are present.

¶23

The prayer for withdrawal is allowed.

¶24

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Syed Fiddusar Rahman v. the State of Assam and 9 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Fiddusar Rahman v. the State of Assam and 9 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bimal Kalita Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Basanta Kalita Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Ziaul Karim Laskar Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

MD Tariquel Islam Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

MD Ashik Ikbal Vs the State of Assam and 7 Ors.

Moynul Hoque Vs Union of India and 8 Ors.