Saurabh Poddar v. Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner argued infringement, and the bench dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous.
The petitioner argued infringement, and the bench dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010073742026
2026:GAU-AS:13698-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2187/2026
SAURABH PODDAR
S/O- SRI MANOJ PODDAR, RESIDING AT 21, BELVEDERE ROAD, ALIPORE, KOLKATA- 700027.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, 5TH FLOOR, A- WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI -110001.
2:INDIAN BANK /9ERSTWHILE ALLAHABAD BANK) A BANKING COMPANY DULY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING) ACT 1970 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT PB NO. 5555 254-260 AVVAI SHANMUGAM SALAI ROYAPETTAH CHENNAI-600014 AND A BRANCH OFFICE AT H.S. ROAD DIBRUGARH ASSAM-786001
For the petitioner : Mr. S.C. Keyal, Sr. Advocate
Assisted by Ms. N. Kakati, Advocate
Page No.# 2/2
– B E F O R E –
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
16-09-2026
(Ashutosh Kumar, C.J.)
Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant
SAURABH PODDAR
UNION OF INDIA
2:INDIAN BANK
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court