Allowed¶22

Dr Muhsina Kafiah HUDA v. Dr Waris Ali

Gauhati HC10 Mar 2026Tr.P.(C)./74/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court, Tr.P.(C)/74/2025, Dr Muhsina Kafiah Huda v. Dr Waris Ali, order dated 11.03.2026 by Robin Phukan, J. Transfer petition under Section 24 CPC allowed unopposed: Misc. (G) Case No. 10/2025 pending before District & Sessions Judge, Jorhat transferred to Principal Judge No. 2, Family Court, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, where F.C. (Civil) No. 989/2025 between the same parties is pending; parties to appear before transferee court after 4 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of Misc. (G) Case No. 10/2025 from the court of learned District & Sessions Judge, Jorhat to the court of learned Principal Judge No. 2, Family Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati; parties to appear before the transferee court after 4 weeks. ¶22

Dr Muhsina Kafiah HUDA Vs Dr Waris Ali — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010245072025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Tr.P.(C)./74/2025

¶6

DR MUHSINA KAFIAH HUDA

¶7

W/O DR. WARIS ALI D/O DR. MANIRUL HUDA R/O FLAT NO. 204, JEW TOWER, NEAR RATNAMOULI PALACE, DR. BHABENDRA NATH SAIKIA ROAD, BELTOLA TINIALI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781028

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

DR WARIS ALI

¶10

S/O LATE MD. ALI, NHM, TEOK FRU, JORHAT, ASSAM- 785112

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M BORAH, SIMRAN M KASHYAP

¶12

Advocate for the Respondent : K BARO, MS M DAS,MR. U J SAIKIA

¶13

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

¶14

ORDER

¶15

11.03.2026

¶16

Heard Ms. M. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. U.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶17

2. This petition, under Section 24 of the CPC, is preferred by the petitioner for transferring the Misc. (G) Case No. 10/2025, from court of learned District &

¶18

Page No.# 2/2

¶19

Sessions Judge, Jorhat (court of Jorhat) to the court of learned Principal Judge No. 2, Famiy Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati (court of Guwahati).

¶20

3. Ms. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the wife of the respondent, who had instituted the Misc. (G) Case No. 10/2025, before the court of Jorhat. But, presently she is residing at Guwahati and on such count, it is not possible on her part to attend the aforesaid proceeding at Jorhat and therefore, the same may be transferred to the court of Guwahati, where another proceeding, being F.C. (Civil) No. 989/2025 is also pending between the same parties.

¶21

4. On the other hand, Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection in allowing this petition as the petitioner has instituted another proceeding before the court of learned Principal Judge No. 2, Famiy Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati.

¶22

5. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this petition stands allowed.

¶23

6. Misc. (G) Case No. 10/2025, pending before the court of Jorhat stands transferred to the court of Guwahati.

¶24

7. The parties shall appear before the court of learned Principal Judge No. 2, Famiy Court, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati after 4 weeks.

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Comparing Assistant

Dr Muhsina Kafiah HUDA v. Dr Waris Ali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Muhsina Kafiah HUDA v. Dr Waris Ali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smti Sukla Mallick Saha Vs Dinku Saha

Smti Tilomai Hazarika and 8 Ors. Vs Makan Das @ Prabhabati Das and Ors.

Rofiqul Islam Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Nibedita Baishya @ Nibedita Kalita Vs Dhrubajyoti Baishya

Nabanita Das Vs Manash Pratim Nath

Kanti Devi Vs Chabua Town Committee and Ors.