Disposed¶24

Smti Rinju Chamua v. the State of Assam and Anr.

Gauhati HC15 Feb 2026Crl.Rev.P./61/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court; Crl.Rev.P./61/2015; Rinju Chamua v. State of Assam & Anr. (Minakshi Das); criminal revision closed and disposed of for non-prosecution; conviction appeal (Nagaon ASJ, Crim. Appeal 86/2012) order dated 31.10.2014 under challenge; JMFC Nagaon CR Case 2048/2008 judgment dated 11.10.2012; stay dated 02.03.2015; compromise petition filed but not traced in record; amicus curiae D K Bhattacharyya fee payable by Registry.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision petition is closed and disposed of for non-prosecution. The Court appreciated the services of the learned Amicus Curiae and directed the Registry to make payment of his fee as per notification. ¶24

Smti Rinju Chamua Vs the State of Assam and Anr. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010009562015

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./61/2015

¶6

SMTI RINJU CHAMUA

¶7

W/O RABESH CHAMUA R/O JYOTINAGAR, PANIGAON KAC GOLI, P.O. PANIGAON, P.S. NAGAON, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

THE STATE OF ASSAM and ANR

¶10

2:MINAKSHI DAS

¶11

W/O BHUPEN DAS R/O SUTO HAIBOOR NAJIRAJAN P.O. SUTO HAIBOR P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM

¶12

Advocate for the Petitioner : MRA SHARMA, MR. D K BHATTACHARYYA, AMICUS CURIAE

¶13

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶14

Page No.# 2/2

¶15

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

¶16

ORDER

¶17

16.02.2026

¶18

Heard Mr. D K Bhattacharyya, learned Amicus Curiae representing the petitioner, appointed by this court.

¶19

The learned Amicus Curiae has submitted that the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 31.10.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagaon in Criminal Appeal No. 86/2012 affirming the judgment and sentence dated 11.10.2012 by the learned JMFC, Nagaon in CR Case No. 2048/2008 had been stayed by this Court vide order dated 02.03.2015.

¶20

Thereafter, on 29.01.2016, the parties had submitted before this court that, a compromise petition was filed by both the parties but the same was not in record.

¶21

The learned Amicus Curiae has submitted that in the records, he has searched, the compromise petition stated to have been filed by both the parties, is not found.

¶22

It appears from the record that none has appeared for the petitioner on and from 15.12.2025.

¶23

Considering entire aspect of the matter, this court is of the opinion that the present criminal revision petition needs to be closed for non-prosecution.

¶24

Accordingly, the criminal revision petition is closed and disposed of.

¶25

Further, this Court appreciates the services rendered by the learned Amicus Curiae.

¶26

Registry is directed to do the needful for making payment of the fee of the learned Amicus Curiae for his assistance, as per notification.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Smti Rinju Chamua v. the State of Assam and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smti Rinju Chamua v. the State of Assam and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rehana Akter Choudhury @ Rahena Aktar Choudhury Vs Bhaskar Jyoti Sarma and Anr.

Anjana Phukan and Anr. Vs the Union of India and 4 Ors.

Smti. Riva Borkataky Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.

Abinash Barman Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Eusub Ali and 2 Ors. Vs the State of Assam

Manai Hussain Vs the State of Assam