Disposed¶25

Fokhoruddin Ali Ahmed v. Kurban Ali

Gauhati HC15 Mar 2026Crl.Rev.P./126/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Revision Petition, Gauhati High Court, Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia, dispensation of personal attendance, appearance through video conferencing, trial attendance exemption, aged accused with medical problems, Section 438 BNSS 2023, Section 442 BNSS 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, NICR Case No.08/2025, Chief Judicial Magistrate Chirang, direction to trial court, Crl.Rev.P./126/2026, decided 16.03.2026, neutral citation 2026:GAU-AS:3772.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chirang by video conferencing; the Trial Court directed to proceed with the trial while providing video conferencing facility to the petitioner. ¶25

Fokhoruddin Ali Ahmed Vs Kurban Ali — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010045492026

2026:GAU-AS:3772

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./126/2026

¶6

FOKHORUDDIN ALI AHMED

¶7

S/O. LATE INTAZUDDIN AHMED, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE WARD NO. 2, BORTALOWA, P.O. DHALIGAON, P.S. KAJALGAON, CHIRANG, PIN 783385, ASSAM, AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT 1C, EUREKA ASHIYANA, BISHNU RABHA PATH, BELTOLA, P.S. BASISTHA, GUWAHATI781028, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

KURBAN ALI

¶10

SON OF MAYDAN ALI,RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SALMARA, P.OFAGUNGAON, P.S.MANIKPUR, DIST BONGAIGAON,ASSAM, PIN 783390.

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S S S RAHMAN, MR. S S A RAHMAN,MR. M R SODIAL,MS G SARMAH

¶12

Advocate for the Respondent : ,

¶13

Page No.# 2/3

¶14

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

¶15

ORDER

¶16

Date : 16.03.2026

¶17

1. Heard Mr. S. S. A. Rahman, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

2. This is an application filed under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in respect of NICR Case No.08/2025, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chirang.

¶19

3. The petitioner Fokhruddin Ali Ahmed is facing trial before the Court below. He is 60 years old, he resides at Guwahati and he has medical problems also.

¶20

4. The petitioner submits that it is difficult for him to attain the Court at Chirang on each and every date of hearing therefore; he prays that his attendance may be dispensed with.

¶21

5. I have considered the submissions made by Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶22

6. The petitioner shall appear before the Court below at Chirang by video conferencing.

¶23

7. The Trial Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chirang is directed to proceed with the Trial Court of the case by giving video conferencing facility to the present petitioner.

¶24

Page No.# 3/3

¶25

8. With the aforesaid direction, this Criminal Revision Petition stands disposed

¶26

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Fokhoruddin Ali Ahmed v. Kurban Ali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fokhoruddin Ali Ahmed v. Kurban Ali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rinku Malakar Vs the State of Assam

Shamim Ahmed Alias Samim Hujur Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Rumi Saikia Vs the State of Assam

Nazim Uddin Mahammed Nazim Uddin and Anr. Vs the State of Assam

Rangila Hazarika Vs Lani Das

Sunil Mondal Vs the State of Assam