Atung @ Vijay Dada and Anr. v. The State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court entertained an application to quash a Special Court order rejecting an adjournment for a POCSO trial defense witness and admission of documents. The trial proceedings were stayed pending realization of scanned court records and further consideration.
What did the court decide?
Stay of criminal trial proceedings pending realization of TCR and further consideration of the petition.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040015332026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn./294/2026
Atung @ Vijay Dada and Anr
Son of Late Lalu Dada, resident of Jeju Dada Village, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh and represented by Shri Ajay Dada, Son of Late Lalu Dada, resident of Jeju Dada Village, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal PRadesh. 2: Tama Tara Age: Occupation : Son of Late Kafi Tara resident of Type-I Colony Seppa PO and PS Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS The State of AP through the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak, Geni Kirkom,Tukrin Ligu,Tanur Gao,Goyi Taba Raju,Tonni Gammi,Amy Talom
Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Special Court ought to have allowed an adjournment for a defence witness on health grounds or allowed the adduction of vital documents which were rejected?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Atung @ Vijay Dada and Anr
- respondent
The State of AP through the PP of AP
Coram
ANJAN MONI KALITA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- Crl.Petn./294/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court