The Gauhati High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal petition and disposed of the petition accordingly, while retaining liberty to file a fresh petition.
Prayer to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010133432026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./959/2026
MOKSEDUL HOQUE SARKAR ALIAS MOKSEDUL ISLAM SON OF ROFIAL HOQUE RESIDENT OF JHOWDANGA MIDDLE POLICE STATION MANKACHAR DISTRICT SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:KOHELA KHATUN
WIFE OF LATE MOHUBAR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF JHOWDANGA MIDDLE POLICE STATION MANKACHAR DISTRICT SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S RAHMAN, B AHMED,MS L MISHRA,MS. S PHUKAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
15.09.2026
Mr. S. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file a fresh one, as some
Page No.# 2/2
inadvertent mistake crepted in the petition.
Prayer allowed.
This Criminal Petition stands disposed of on withdrawal.
However, liberty will remain with the petitioner to approach this Court again by filing appropriate petition.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Moksdul Hoque Sarkar alias Moksdul Islam
The State of Assam
Koheila Khatun
Robin Phukan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
