Petitioners filed a criminal writ petition. Counsel requested withdrawal of the petition; the opposing counsel raised no objection. Court disposed of the matter accordingly.
Matter disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010133262026
2026:GAU-AS:13455
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Crl.Pet./952/2026
SRI KUNAL PATHAK AND ANR SON OF SRI RATNESWAR PATHAK RESIDENT OF TAMULPUR
P.S. -TAMULPURP.O- TAMULPUR DISTRICT- TAMULPUR ASSAM. PINCODE-781367
2: PUSHPA GURUNG W/O SRI KUNAL PATHAK RESIDENT OF BARUAHBARI SONAPUR GUWAHATI EAST DIST- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN CODE- 782402 VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM
-----------Advocate for : MR A SHARMA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
ORDER
Date : 14-09-2026
Heard Ms. M Bhuyan, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K K Das, the learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of State respondent.
Scanned TCR has already been received. But, it is submitted by Ms. Bhuyan that as per instruction of her client she wants to withdraw the same to which the learned Addl. PP raised no objection.
In view of this, let the matter be accordingly disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Kunal Pathak and Anr
State of Assam
Mitali Thakuria
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
