Disposed¶25

Rofikul Islam Alias Rofiqul Islam v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC12 Mar 2026Crl.Pet./363/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court; Crl.Pet./363/2026; Rofikul Islam alias Rofiqul Islam v. State of Assam; Section 528 BNSS 2023; PRC (Police Report Cases) Case No.58/2025; Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar; absconder in charge sheet; summons issued; apprehension of remand on appearance; direction to appear within 10 days; release on bail ₹25,000 with surety of like amount; petition disposed of; dated 13.03.2026; Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar in PRC Case No.58/2025 within 10 days; on appearance, to be released on bail of Rs. 25,000/- with a surety of like amount. ¶25

Rofikul Islam Alias Rofiqul Islam Vs the State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010051072026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

¶5

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶6

Case No. : Crl.Pet./363/2026

¶7

ROFIKUL ISLAM ALIAS ROFIQUL ISLAM S/O MOTLEB ALI

¶8

RESIDENT OF VILL- BORORAVATARY, PART-I, P.O. RAVATARI, P.S. SOUTH SALMARA, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM.

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

¶11

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED, MR A HAI

¶12

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,

¶13

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Date : 13.03.2026

¶16

Heard Mr. M Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P S Lahkar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam.

¶17

This is an application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 in respect of PRC (Police Report Cases) Case No.58/2025 pending in the Court of the learned Additional

¶18

Page No.# 2/2

¶19

Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar.

¶20

The petitioner Rofikul Islam @ Rofiqul Islam is shown as an absconder in the charge sheet. The trial court has issued summons against him. The petitioner now apprehends that he will be remanded to custody if he appears before the trial court. 4. Mr. Ahmed submits that the petitioner is interested in facing the trial and therefore, the petitioner should be given adequate opportunities to that effect.

¶21

I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

¶22

This Court is of the opinion that since the petitioner is interested in facing the trial, he deserves to be given adequate opportunities to face the trial.

¶23

Therefore, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed.

¶24

The petitioner Rofikul Islam @ Rofiqul Islam is directed to appear before the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar in respect of PRC (Police Report Cases) Case No.58/2025 within next 10 (ten) days from today. On his appearance, he shall be released on bail of ₹25,000/- with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar.

¶25

With the aforesaid direction, the criminal petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

Comparing Assistant

Rofikul Islam Alias Rofiqul Islam v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rofikul Islam Alias Rofiqul Islam v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kabir Ahmed Choudhury Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Saju Haque Barbhuiya Alias Shaju Barbhuiya Vs the State of Assam

Tea Store and Anr. Vs Dkd Marketing

Samiran Begum Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Fulchan Ali Sk Vs the State of Assam

Gajanand Munda Vs the State of Assam