Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of 111 days delay in filing a connected appeal allowed due to poverty and lack of awareness.
Condonation of delay of 111 days allowed; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010086432026
2026:GAU-AS:6166
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/460/2026
DHIRAJ DAS
S/O. RAMESH DAS, R/O. JATIA BORDUAR, P/S. PALASHBARI, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781120
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SAURADEEP DEY,
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER
Date : 06-05-2026
Heard learned counsel Mr. S. Dey for the applicant, who has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, with prayer for condonation of delay of 111 (one Hundred and Eleven) days in filing the connected appeal.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DHIRAJ DAS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
