Dismissed¶22

Hussain Ahmed Laskar v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC1 Apr 2026I.A.(Crl.)/142/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal refused; application under Section 430 BNSS, 2023 rejected by Gauhati High Court; applicants convicted under Sections 302/34 IPC (murder with common intention) in Sessions Case No. 300/2016, judgment dated 26.12.2024, Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) No. 3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati; injured eyewitnesses PW-2 and PW-3; deceased Jakir Hussain died at GMCH; parties from Sonapur Pathar, Sonapur, Kamrup Metro/M, Assam; advocates D Bora for applicants, A Begum (Addl. PP) and N Mahajan for the State.

What did the court decide?

There were injured eyewitnesses to the crime: PW-2 and PW-3 deposed that they were hit by the applicants/appellants and became unconscious, and their brother Jakir Hussain died at GMCH in view of the assault made on him by the applicants/appellants. ¶17

Hussain Ahmed Laskar Vs the State of Assam — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010018202025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/142/2025

¶6

HUSSAIN AHMED LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM. 2: SAYED AHMED @ SAYED AHMED LASKAR @ SAHID AHEMAD LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 3: JAHIR AHMED LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM 2:MD RUHUL AMIN S/O. LT. ABDUL GAFUR R/O. KACHUTOLI PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM

¶7

Page No.# 2/3

¶8

PIN-782402.

¶9

-----------Advocate for : MR. N MAHAJAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

¶10

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

ORDER

02.04.2026

(M. Zothankhuma, J)

Heard Mr. D Bora, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants. Also heard Ms. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent.

¶15

This is an application under Section 430 BNSS, 2023, for suspension of the sentence imposed upon the applicants/ appellants by the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) No. 3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in Sessions Case No. 300/2016 vide judgment and order dated 26.12.2024, convicting them under Sections 302/34 IPC.

¶16

We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and as can be seen from the impugned judgment and order, there are injured eye witnesses to the crime in question.

¶17

The evidence of PW-2 and PW-3 is to the effect that they were hit by the applicants/appellants, due to which they had become unconscious. Further, their brother, Jakir Hussain had died at GMCH in view of the assault made on him by the applicants/appellants.

¶18

On considering the above facts, we do not find that a case for grant of bail

¶19

Page No.# 3/3

¶20

and/or suspension of the sentence imposed upon the applicants/appellants is made out.

¶21

As such, we do not find it proper to allow the present application for suspension of the sentence and grant the applicants/appellants bail at this stage.

¶22

Accordingly, the present interlocutory application, stands rejected.

¶23

JUDGE JUDGE

¶24

Comparing Assistant

Hussain Ahmed Laskar v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hussain Ahmed Laskar v. the State of Assam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nawas Sarif Vs Union of India

Ajit Hazarika Vs the State of Assam

Sri Sarat Phukan Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Bhugesh Mali Vs the State of Assam and Anr.

Sankar Yadav @ Sankar Rai Vs State of Assam

MD Abdul Jalil Vs the State of Assam