The Gauhati High Court condoned a 55-day delay in filing a criminal revision under Section 138 of the NI Act, accepting the applicant's explanation of his wife's serious ailment during the limitation period.
The application for condonation of delay is allowed, enabling the criminal revision to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010267992025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1295/2025
SRI BIMAL ALIAS SHANKAR BAROI
SON OF SWAPAN BAROI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ALEXANDARPUR, P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA, PIN-788161, DISTRICTHAILAKANDI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
MR BRAJESH TUSNIAL
SON OF SHYAM LAL TUSNIAL, PARTNER OF CENTURY TRADE AND INDUSTRY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGEAND P.O. ADARPURGHAT, P.S. PANCHGRAM, PIN788803, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N SHARMA, B K SINGHA Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER
14.09.2026
Mr. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per office note dated 10.09.2026 the AD card has been received back from the sole respondent with signature of one Deepak Mozumdar and upon perusing the same, I find that it was sent to the address of the respondent mentioned in the cause title.
Page No.# 2/2
judgment is dated 20.02.2024, passed by Learned CJM, Silchar and the concurring appellate judgment was passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar in Criminal Appeal 29/2024.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 55 days in filing a criminal revision under Section 138 of the NI Act should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI BIMAL ALIAS SHANKAR BAROI
MR BRAJESH TUSNIAL
Pranjal Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
