Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ order on provincialization of an assistant teacher. The Director produced a speaking order stating the petitioner lacks six years continuous service as on 01.01.2017 and is not entitled to provincialization; the petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010250772025
2026:GAU-AS:4148
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/606/2025
BIJOY KR DEY
SON OF LT. ANIL CH DEY, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- FULOGURI, P.S.RANGAPARA, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSISTANT TEACHER (ARTS) OF KADAMTAL HIGH SCHOOL, ASSAM, PIN-784504
VERSUS
SMTI MAMATA HOJAI, AES
THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA-19, KAMRUP (METRO), GUWAHATI-781019
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS A BUJARBARUAH, MS A.SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE, MR. U SARMA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Date : 23.03.2026
Heard Ms. A. Bujarbaruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor.
Page No.# 2/2
Education, Assam submits that the order dated 20.03.2025, passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 6176/2024 has duly been complied with as upon verification of records, the petitioner is not entitled for provincialization on the ground of not having six years continuous service as on 01.01.2017.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court's order dated 20.03.2025 in WP(C) No. 6176/2024 regarding provincialization has been complied with.
Bijoy Kr Dey
Smti Mamata Hojai, AES
Director of Secondary Education Department, Assam
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
