Contempt petition over alleged non-compliance with an earlier writ court order. Petitioner's counsel reported that the order had been complied with, whereupon the High Court closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010041212026
2026:GAU-AS:8360
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/122/2026
MRIDUL KUMAR LASKAR
SON OF LATE KALIPRASAD LASKAR, RESIDENT OF VILL AND P.O. KAMPUR, P.S. KAMPUR, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
MAMATA HOJAI
DIRECTOR CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B HAZARIKA, MR D MAHANTA
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 12.06.2026
Ms. B Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 10.12.2025, passed in WP(C) No.6667/2025, has already been complied with.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, the instant contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 10.12.2025 in WP(C) No.6667/2025 had been complied with, permitting closure of the contempt petition.
Mridul Kumar Laskar
Mamata Hojai, Director Cum Disciplinary Authority, Secondary Education, Assam
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
