Disposed

Ikbal Hussain and Anr. v. Bikash Saikia and Ors.

Gauhati HC12 Feb 2026I.A.(Civil)/4153/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants sought impleadment of six elected Assam Pharmacy Council members as respondents to an accompanying writ petition. The court, holding the adjudication would touch their rights, arrayed them as respondent Nos. 9 to 14 and directed filing of a fresh Memo of Parties; the I.A. was closed.

What did the court decide?

Six applicants' proposed respondents arrayed as respondent Nos. 9-14 in the writ petition; Registry directed to correct cause title; I.A. closed.

Ikbal Hussain and Anr. Vs Bikash Saikia and Ors. — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010267832025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4153/2025

¶6

IKBAL HUSSAIN AND ANR S/O RAFIQUL ISLAM R/O JARAMARI P.O.- BALISATRA DIST- NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782122

¶7

2: MUSHABID AHMED

¶8

S/O KERAMAT ALI

¶9

RESIDENT OF BORPAKA PO TORABARI RUPAHIHAT DIST NAGAON ASSAM 782125 VERSUS

¶10

BIKASH SAIKIA AND ORS S/O NABIN CHANDRA SAIKIA

¶11

RESIDENT OF KUMOI PUKHURI PAR JAGI BHAKAT GAON MORIGAON 782411 ASSAM

¶12

2:BIRENDRA KR. BARMAN REGD. NO. 6119 S/O PABINDRA BARMAN RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 38 FC ROAD UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI

¶13

Page No.# 2/3

¶14

KAMRUP M ASSAM 781001

¶15

3:FIRDOUS KHAN REGD. NO. 11225 S/O ALI AKBAR KHAN RESIDENT OF CHAKLA BONGAIGAON ASSAM 783392

¶16

4:MATIUR RAHMAN

¶17

REGD. NO. 11099 S/O MD. HAMID ALI RESIDENT OF MILANPUR NALBARI ASSAM. 781337

¶18

5:RIAZUDDIN AHMED

¶19

REGD NO. 12040 S/O LATE ABDUL HAMID RESIDENT OF JURIRPUR NAGAON ASSAM 782426

¶20

6:MIZANUR RAHMAN REGD. NO. 14890 S/O UMED ALI RESIDENT OF KHAIRAMARI KANDHULIMARI NAGAON ASSAM 782123

¶21

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Mahanta, Advocate

¶22

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, Advocate

¶23

BEFORE

¶24

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R

¶25

13.02.2026

¶26

This is an application filed by the applicants to implead six elected

¶27

Page No.# 3/3

¶28

members of the Assam Pharmacy Council as the respondents to the accompanying writ petition.

¶29

Taking into account that the adjudication in the accompanying writ petition would touch upon the rights of the said elected members, it is the opinion of this Court that they should also be made parties to the instant accompanying petition.

¶30

Accordingly, the six respondents in the instant application are arrayed as respondent Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 to the accompanying writ petition.

¶31

The learned counsel for the applicants shall file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court and the Registry shall make necessary correction in the cause title on the basis of the present order as well as update the same in the CIS.

¶32

With the above, the instant I.A. stands closed.

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

Comparing Assistant

Ikbal Hussain and Anr. v. Bikash Saikia and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ikbal Hussain and Anr. v. Bikash Saikia and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kadir and 132 Ors. Vs the Union of India and 9 Ors.

Abul Kasem and 72 Ors. Vs Union of India and 9 Ors.

Mahammad Ali and 61 Ors. Vs Union of India and 9 Ors.

Sanjay Chauhan and 242 Ors. Vs the State of Assam and 5 Ors.

M/S Ejangpo Integrated Farm and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.

Monowara Khatun and Anr. Vs the State of Assam and Othrs