Allowed

Sri Kushal Hasapurti v. Sri Mangra Mura @ Munda

Gauhati HC15 Sept 2026I.A.(Civil)/240/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court disposed of an application seeking condonation of a 66-day delay in filing a connected appeal. The court held that the delay was satisfactorily explained and allowed the application, directing registration of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 66 days in preferring connected appeal condoned; appeal registered and listed for admission hearing.

Sri Kushal Hasapurti Vs Sri Mangra Mura @ Munda — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Gauhati HC (2026)

Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010018862025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶5

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/240/2025

¶6

SRI KUSHAL HASAPURTI

¶7

S/O LATE GUNA HASAPURTI, RESIDENT OF HIRAJULI TE, PO AND PS DARRANG, PANBARI, DIST SONITPUR ,ASSAM

¶8

2: SMTI ANU HASAPURTI D/O LATE GUNA HASAPURTI RESIDENT OF HIRAJULI TE PO AND PS DARRANG PANBARI DIST SONITPUR ASSAM

¶9

3: SMTI PHULMONI HASAPURTI D/O LATE GUNA HASAPURTI RESIDENT OF HIRAJULI TE PO AND PS DARRANG PANBARI DIST SONITPUR ASSA

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

SRI MANGRA MURA @ MUNDA S/O LATE BISUN MURA @ MUNDA, RESIDENT OF MEDHIPAM, MOUZA DHEKIAJULI, PO AND PS TEZPUR, DIST SONITPUR, ASSAM

¶12

2:SRI SUKRA MURA @ MUNDA S/O LATE BISUN MURA @ MUNDA

¶13

RESIDENT OF MEDHIPAM MOUZA DHEKIAJULI PO AND PS TEZPUR DIST SONITPUR

¶14

Page No.# 2/4

¶15

ASSAM

¶16

3:SRI BAJNATH MURA @ MUNDA S/O LATE BISUN MURA @ MUNDA

¶17

RESIDENT OF MEDHIPAM MOUZA DHEKIAJULI PO AND PS TEZPUR DIST SONITPUR ASSAM

¶18

4:SRI BIJAY MURA @ MUNDA S/O LATE BISUN MURA @ MUNDA

¶19

RESIDENT OF MEDHIPAM MOUZA DHEKIAJULI PO AND PS TEZPUR DIST SONITPUR ASSAM

¶20

5:SRI PABAN MURA @ MUNDA S/O LATE BISUN MURA @ MUNDA

¶21

RESIDENT OF MEDHIPAM MOUZA DHEKIAJULI PO AND PS TEZPUR DIST SONITPUR ASSAM

¶22

6:SRI BHUHAN MURA @ MUNDA S/O LATE BISUN MURA @ MUNDA

¶23

RESIDENT OF MEDHIPAM MOUZA DHEKIAJULI PO AND PS TEZPUR DIST SONITPUR ASSA

¶24

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SAHU, S SHAHI,MS A ROY

¶25

Advocate for the Respondent : ,

¶26

Linked Case :

¶27

Page No.# 3/4

¶28

SRI KUSHAL HASAPURTI SONITPUR ASSAM

¶29

2: SMTI ANU HASAPURTI SONITPUR ASSAM

¶30

3: SMTI PHULMONI HASAPURTI SONITPUR ASSAM VERSUS

¶31

SRI MANGRA MURA ALIAS MUNDA SONITPUR ASSAM

¶32

2:SRI SUKRA MURA ALIAS MUNDA SONITPUR ASSAM

¶33

3:SRI BAJNATH MURA ALIAS MUNDA SONITPUR ASSAM

¶34

4:SRI BIJAY MURA ALIAS MUNDA SONITPUR ASSAM

¶35

5:SRI PABAN MURA ALIAS MUNDA SONITPUR ASSAM

¶36

6:SRI BHUHAN MURA ALIAS MUNDA SONITPUR ASSAM -----------Advocate for : SURENDRA SAHU Advocate for : appearing for SRI MANGRA MURA ALIAS MUNDA

¶37

Page No.# 4/4

¶38

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

¶39

ORDER

¶40

Date : 16.09.2026

¶41

Heard Mr. A Roy, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.

¶42

None appears for the respondent nos. 1 to 6 inspite of service of notice.

¶43

This is an application filed under Order 41 Rule 3A of the CPC read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 66 days in preferring the connected appeal.

¶44

The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay is condoned.

¶45

The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing.

¶46

The present interlocutory application is disposed of.

¶47

JUDGE

¶48

Comparing Assistant

Sri Kushal Hasapurti v. Sri Mangra Mura @ Munda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Kushal Hasapurti v. Sri Mangra Mura @ Munda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases