Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Iftikar Sarwar Mazarbhuiyan Vs the State of Assam — Gauhati HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Gauhati HC
2026
Iftikar Sarwar Mazarbhuiyan Vs the State of AssamIftikar Sarwar Mazarbhuiyan v. the State of Assam

Allowed¶¶31

Iftikar Sarwar Mazarbhuiyan v. the State of Assam

Gauhati HC7 Jun 2026I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Gauhati High Court single-Judge order dated 08.06.2026 by Justice Kardak Ete in I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026, allowing correction of the inadvertently wrong addresses of opposite party Nos. 5-7 (Siddique Ali, Ahmed Ali, Aminur Haque) in the connected writ petition WP(C)/1563/2026 (Nur Mohammad Ali v. State of Assam and 6 Ors.; Dhubri/Bilasipara revenue-circle matter). Counsel: R. I. Bhuyan for the applicant; A. Bhattacharjee, Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department for opposite party No. 1 (State); J. Handique for opposite party Nos. 2-4. Interlocutory and procedural in nature; no statute or precedent cited; of limited precedential value, relevant mainly to records of cause-title/address correction.

What did the court decide?

The interlocutory application was allowed: the applicant is permitted to make necessary corrections to the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in WP(C) No. 1563/2026 and to substitute them with their correct addresses; the application stands disposed of.

Why is it important?

The applicant/writ petitioner appears to have arrayed opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 with incorrect addresses inadvertently; the Court therefore deemed it appropriate to allow the interlocutory application. ¶¶30

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

The interlocutory application was allowed: the applicant is permitted to make necessary corrections to the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in WP(C) No. 1563/2026 and to substitute them with their correct addresses; the application stands disposed of.

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant/writ petitioner should be permitted to correct the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in the connected writ petition WP(C) No. 1563/2026, which were said to have been incorrectly mentioned due to an inadvertent error.

Court's answer

The applicant/writ petitioner appears to have arrayed opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 with incorrect addresses inadvertently; the Court therefore deemed it appropriate to allow the interlocutory application.

Ratio / Principle

The applicant is permitted to make necessary corrections in respect of the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in WP(C) No. 1563/2026 and to substitute the same with their correct addresses.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

ORDER (Gauhati High Court, Kardak Ete, J.), 08.06.2026 in I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026 connected with WP(C) No. 1563/2026 (Nur Mohammad Ali v. State of Assam and 6 Ors.) — Correction of addresses in cause-title; inadvertent error. The applicant/writ petitioner had arrayed opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 (Siddique Ali, Ahmed Ali and Aminur Haque) with incorrect addresses. Held: considering that the incorrect addresses were supplied inadvertently, the interlocutory application was allowed and the applicant was permitted to make the necessary corrections in respect of the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in WP(C) No. 1563/2026 and to substitute the same with their correct addresses; the application stands disposed of. Purely procedural order; no statutory provision or precedent engaged.

A

Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010052412026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026

IFTIKAR SARWAR MAZARBHUIYAN ADVOCATE GAUHATI HIGH COURT S/O NAZRUL HAQUE MAZARBHUIYAN R/O- 7TH KALAGURU PATH DR. ZAKIR HUSSAIN ROAD .- HENGRABARI GUWAHATI DISTRICTKAMRUPM PIN-781036 ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

TO BE REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI781006.

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301.

3:SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL)

BILASIPARA P.O.- BILASIPARA PIN- 783348.

Page No.# 2/4

4:CIRCLE OFFICER BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE BILASIPARA ASSAM PIN-783348. 5:SIDDIQUE ALI S/O LT. HATEM ALI R/O VILLAGE- CHARUABAKRA P.S.- CHAPAR DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN-783371. 6:AHMED ALI S/O AJGAR ALI ALIAS AZHAR ALI R/O VILLAGE- CHARUABAKRA P.S.- CHAPAR DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN-783371. 7:AMINUR HAQUE S/O LT. HATEM ALI R/O VILLAGE- CHARUABAKRA P.S.- CHAPAR DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN-783371. -----------Advocate for : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

Linked Case : WP(C)/1563/2026

NUR MOHAMMAD ALI

S/O LT. ABDUL RAHMAN ALIAS ABDUR RAHMAN, R/O HAKAMA PART-V, BILASIPARA, DISTRICT - DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783348.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

Page No.# 3/4

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301. 3:SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) BILASIPARA P.O.- BILASIPARA PIN- 783348. 4:CIRCLE OFFICER BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE BILASIPARA ASSAM PIN-783348. 5:SIDDIQUE ALI S/O LT. HATEM ALI R/O VILLAGE- CHARUABAKRA P.S.- CHAPAR DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN-783371. 6:AHMED ALI S/O AJGAR ALI ALIAS AZHAR ALI R/O VILLAGE- CHARUABAKRA P.S.- CHAPAR DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN-783371. 7:AMINUR HAQUE S/O LT. HATEM ALI R/O VILLAGE- CHARUABAKRA P.S.- CHAPAR DISTRICT- DHUBRI PIN-783371

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, I S MAZARBHUIYAN,T OSIK,MS. L WAJEEDA,MR R I BHUYAN,MR. M H SAIKIA

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, A ISLAM(R6),MR. A DEB(R6),MD S A MONDAL(R6),MR. A A R KARIM(R6),SC, REVENUE

Page No.# 4/4

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

Date : 08.06.2026

Heard Mr. R. I. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department for opposite party No. 1, and Mr. J. Handique, learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos. 2, 3 & 4.

This is an application praying for correction of the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 in the connected writ petition, being WP(C) No. 1563/2026, on the ground that their addresses have been incorrectly mentioned due to an inadvertent error.

Having considered that the applicant/writ petitioner appears to have arrayed the opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 with incorrect addresses inadvertently, I deem it appropriate to allow this interlocutory application. Accordingly, the applicant is permitted to make necessary corrections in respect of the addresses of the opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in WP(C) No. 1563/2026 and to substitute the same with their correct addresses.

Interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the applicant/writ petitioner should be permitted to correct the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in the connected writ petition WP(C) No. 1563/2026, which were said to have been incorrectly mentioned due to an inadvertent error.¶¶29
The court held
The applicant/writ petitioner appears to have arrayed opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 with incorrect addresses inadvertently; the Court therefore deemed it appropriate to allow the interlocutory application.ratio¶¶30

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
The applicant filed I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026 praying for correction of the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 in the connected writ petition WP(C) No. 1563/2026, on the ground that the addresses were incorrectly mentioned due to an inadvertent error.¶¶29
Prior proceeding
Linked case WP(C)/1563/2026: Nur Mohammad Ali v. The State of Assam and 6 Ors., the connected writ petition in which the present interlocutory application arises.¶¶15

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
IFTIKAR SARWAR MAZARBHUIYAN¶¶6
MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, Mr. R. I. Bhuyan
respondent
THE STATE OF ASSAM¶¶8
Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, GA ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
respondent
THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DISTRICT DHUBRI¶¶10
Mr. J. Handique
respondent
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL)¶¶11
Mr. J. Handique
respondent
CIRCLE OFFICER BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE¶¶14
Mr. J. Handique
respondent
SIDDIQUE ALI¶¶14
respondent
AHMED ALI¶¶14
A ISLAM, MR. A DEB, MD S A MONDAL, MR. A A R KARIM
respondent
AMINUR HAQUE¶¶14
petitioner
NUR MOHAMMAD ALI¶¶16
MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, I S MAZARBHUIYAN, T OSIK, MS. L WAJEEDA, MR R I BHUYAN, MR. M H SAIKIA

Coram

AI extract

KARDAK ETEauthor¶¶25

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Gauhati HC
Decided on: 7 Jun 2026 · June
Registered: 29 May 2026
Case no.: I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026
CNR: GAHC010105502026
Bench: Kardak Ete
Disposal: Disposed Of
Case type: I.A.(Civil)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Kardak Ete

Iifl Finance Limited Vs the State of Assam and 3 Ors.
4 Jun 2026
Nandini Dutta Vs State of Haryana and 6 Ors.
4 Jun 2026
M/S Metal Syndicate and Other Vs the Union of India and Others
4 Jun 2026
Toklima Khatun Vs the State of Assam and 2 Ors.
7 Jun 2026
Smti Bhargabi Bhattacharyya Vs the State of Assam and 16 Ors.
7 Jun 2026
Smti Ivy Dutta Vs the Union of India and 3 Ors.
7 Jun 2026

Cite this judgement

Iftikar Sarwar Mazarbhuiyan v. the State of Assam, I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026 (GAU), decided on 7 June 2026.

The Gauhati High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history2

The applicant filed I.A.(Civil)/1801/2026 praying for correction of the addresses of opposite party Nos. 5, 6 & 7 in the connected writ petition WP(C) No. 1563/2026, on the ground that the addresses were incorrectly mentioned due to an inadvertent error.
Linked case WP(C)/1563/2026: Nur Mohammad Ali v. The State of Assam and 6 Ors., the connected writ petition in which the present interlocutory application arises.

View full history

Bench / Coram

KARDAK ETE

Parties & counsel